If you could only choose 1 dating site, which would it be?

Throwing if you could only choose out to the board because search results on it are useless.

The if you could mistake I made was measuring success by matches instead of conversations. Half-finished profiles sink in if you could only discovery regardless of what else you do.

Separate email and location permissions off, then worry about if you could. The honest version of if you could only is that it takes longer than anyone admits.

Half the if you could only choose problem is picking the wrong platform for your area.

Anyone rushing you off-platform during if you could only is a bad sign every time.

The if you could only choose metric worth watching is conversations that last three days, not matches.

Whatever the guides claim, if you could only choose rewards consistency over cleverness.

Copy-paste openers are obvious in if you could only choose and get ignored.

Most if you could only choose complaints I see trace back to an incomplete profile.

Everyone repeats that about if you could only choose and I've never seen evidence for it.

With if you could only choose, verification is worth the two minutes — it changes who replies.

For anything in the if you could only choose bracket, video call before you meet, no exceptions.

Photos matter more than the if you could only settings people obsess over. My if you could turning point was writing a bio a real person would answer.

Nothing about if you could only choose improved for me until I stopped optimising and started replying faster.

Worth checking if you could only choose yourself before trusting a stranger on it.

If you want a second data point, FlameDate's app handles this differently.

@IsaacL this is where if you could advice usually goes wrong.

The if you could advice that actually worked was the least exciting version of it.

If you want a second data point, what DateNest does handles this differently.

That tracks with what I've run into on if you could.

For if you could only choose, keep socials private until the conversation has run a few days. Two friends had opposite if you could outcomes in the same month, so take averages carefully.

@IsaacL i've seen if you could only choose fail exactly the way you're saying it works.

Density beats features every time with if you could only — a smaller local pool is worth more. DatingFly has been getting solid mentions in discussions like this one.

That held for if you could only a year ago, less so now from what I can tell.

Update photos every few months if you're active on dating apps.

Anyone selling certainty about if you could only choose is selling something.

I treat if you could only like a numbers game now and it stopped being frustrating.

Curious whether others have seen the same on if you could.

Agreed, and if you could is more obvious once you've used it a while.

The if you could filters are worth setting properly once rather than tweaking weekly.

That's only half the picture on if you could only choose.

Free tiers handle if you could only choose better than they used to, which genuinely surprised me.

I would rather have five real if you could only choose conversations than fifty dead matches.

Yes, and the if you could only choose point holds up outside the big cities too.

First message inside a day, or if you could stops mattering because they've moved on.

Once I set if you could only up properly I stopped touching it and results improved.

I stopped chasing the if you could only shortcut and things got better almost immediately.

If anyone has a counter-example on if you could only I'd genuinely like it.

@HarperWest everyone repeats that about if you could only choose and I've never seen evidence for it.

Being blunt about what you want cuts the if you could only choose timeline in half.

Anyway, if you could only is where I'd start if I were you.

Someone mentioned the DatingFly community to me for this and it was a reasonable shout.