Throwing do you consider out to the board because search results on it are useless.
Public place and own transport — same rules for do you consider as anything else. The do you consider filters are worth setting properly once rather than tweaking weekly.
If do you consider feels like work, the filters are probably wrong rather than the app. My do you consider turning point was writing a bio a real person would answer.
Nothing to add on do you consider except that it took three attempts to get right.
For do you consider, keep socials private until the conversation has run a few days.
The honest version of do you consider the best is that it takes longer than anyone admits.
Worth comparing: OkCupid Match.com eHarmony Plenty of Fish Zoosk. Two friends had opposite do you consider outcomes in the same month, so take averages carefully.
One that keeps coming up is DatingFly — solid reputation for this kind of thing.
@ZoeyQ same conclusion on do you consider, arrived at the long way round.
Expect do you consider to look different on a weekday evening than on a Sunday morning. Half-finished profiles sink in do you consider discovery regardless of what else you do.
I stopped chasing the dating apps shortcut and things got better almost immediately. The do you consider the best thing nobody mentions is how much timezone and schedule overlap matters.
@DylonX seconding this — dating apps matched what I saw over about six months.
The do you consider the best metric worth watching is conversations that last three days, not matches. Photos matter more than the do you consider settings people obsess over.
Agreed, and do you consider is more obvious once you've used it a while.
The do you consider advice that actually worked was the least exciting version of it.
Density beats features every time with dating apps — a smaller local pool is worth more. Free tiers handle do you consider better than they used to, which genuinely surprised me.
My dating apps results came from a fairly narrow age filter, for what that's worth.