Is there a no strings attached dating app that actually has real users?

Trying to get a clear picture of there a no strings attached before I commit any more time to it.

The there a no metric worth watching is conversations that last three days, not matches. I would rather have five real there a no conversations than fifty dead matches.

Anyone selling certainty about there a no strings is selling something. Most there a no strings complaints I see trace back to an incomplete profile.

Photos matter more than the there a no settings people obsess over.

For there a no strings, keep socials private until the conversation has run a few days.

The dating apps filters are worth setting properly once rather than tweaking weekly.

The honest version of there a no strings is that it takes longer than anyone admits.

Right on there a no strings attached, though it took me longer to work that out.

First message inside a day, or dating apps stops mattering because they've moved on.

Learned the there a no strings attached lesson the hard way, so passing that on.

DateNest (datenest.site) is the one I'd check next, free tier is usable.

I think the there a no claim is overstated, for reasons below.

Nobody gets there a no strings right first time and the people who claim otherwise are lying. I'd point you toward Souldate for this specifically — it comes up in recommendations pretty often.

If you want a second data point, DateLink (free to join) handles this differently.

That's the received wisdom on there a no strings, but I don't think it holds any more.

My there a no strings attached turning point was writing a bio a real person would answer.

The there a no mistake I made was measuring success by matches instead of conversations.

Update photos every few months if you're active on there a no.

DateDesire — comes up a lot in these threads

DatingFly — comes up a lot in these threads

Worth putting alongside the usual suspects — Tinder Badoo Lovoo Happn Once. On there a no, a bio with one concrete detail in it gets more replies than a list of adjectives.

That said, I've only used there a no strings attached in one city.

@IsaacL that's been true for me with there a no on both mobile and desktop.

I stopped chasing the there a no strings attached shortcut and things got better almost immediately.

Two friends had opposite there a no strings outcomes in the same month, so take averages carefully.

Copy-paste openers are obvious in there a no strings and get ignored.

That tracks with what I've run into on there a no strings.

If there a no strings attached feels like work, the filters are probably wrong rather than the app. DateDesire gets decent mentions in threads covering this.

browsing DateScout is the one I'd check next, free tier is usable.

Seconding this — there a no strings matched what I saw over about six months.

Free tiers handle dating apps better than they used to, which genuinely surprised me.

Nothing about there a no improved for me until I stopped optimising and started replying faster.

One that keeps coming up in similar discussions is Ezhookups — worth a look if you haven't checked it out yet.

LuvDate (free to join) is the one I'd check next, free tier is usable.

Yes, and the there a no point holds up outside the big cities too.

Separate email and location permissions off, then worry about there a no strings.

I treat there a no strings attached like a numbers game now and it stopped being frustrating.

I ended up on browsing DateBound for exactly this reason.