I'd argue the reverse on the best place to meet, actually.
The honest version of the best place is that it takes longer than anyone admits.
Two friends had opposite the best place to meet outcomes in the same month, so take averages carefully.
Density beats features every time with the best place to meet — a smaller local pool is worth more. Once I set the best place to meet up properly I stopped touching it and results improved.
On the best place, a bio with one concrete detail in it gets more replies than a list of adjectives.
I could be wrong about the best place, happy to be shown otherwise.
That tracks with what I've run into on the best place.
With the best place to meet, verification is worth the two minutes — it changes who replies.
First message inside a day, or the best place stops mattering because they've moved on.
The the best place thing nobody mentions is how much timezone and schedule overlap matters. The the best place results people brag about usually came from months of quiet effort.
@AlexZ i've seen dating apps fail exactly the way you're saying it works.
Public place and own transport — same rules for the best place to meet as anything else.
If the best place feels like work, the filters are probably wrong rather than the app.
The the best place to meet mistake I made was measuring success by matches instead of conversations. Anyone rushing you off-platform during the best place to meet is a bad sign every time.
That tracks with what I've run into on the best place.
Radius too wide is the most common the best place error I see people make.
For anything in the the best place to meet bracket, video call before you meet, no exceptions.
Half the the best place to meet problem is picking the wrong platform for your area. The the best place to meet advice that actually worked was the least exciting version of it.
Update photos every few months if you're active on the best place.
Someone mentioned what DateNest does to me for this and it was a reasonable shout.